205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-1.56%
Cash & equivalents declining -1.56% while QCOM's grows 9.82%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
27.03%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 26.30%. Walter Schloss would note comparable strategies in building short-term reserves.
16.38%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 17.43%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-19.03%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 68.83%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-4.01%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 10.59%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-9.17%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -24.16%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
7.12%
Below half of QCOM's 23.82%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.33%
Below half QCOM's -7.62%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel M&A strategies or intangible expansions.
-0.48%
Less than half of QCOM's -15.65%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-0.48%
Less than half of QCOM's -15.65%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel investment expansions. Compare portfolio quality.
-5.94%
Less than half of QCOM's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
33.45%
Less than half of QCOM's -21.47%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-6.83%
Below half of QCOM's -17.40%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.48%
Below half of QCOM's 3.45%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-61.64%
Less than half of QCOM's 47.14%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
146.78%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4620.00%
Below half of QCOM's -100.00%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
40.19%
Less than half of QCOM's 105.33%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
11.99%
50-75% of QCOM's 18.23%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
-23.15%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.29%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
13.28%
Less than half of QCOM's 106.78%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-3.32%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.76%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
Less than half of QCOM's 10.39%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.86%
Below half QCOM's 45.92%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
47.76%
Less than half of QCOM's -94.35%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.23%
Below half QCOM's 2.79%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.48%
Below half QCOM's 3.45%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-21.38%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.30%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.15%
Less than half of QCOM's -2.46%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.