PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
14.75%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 15.18%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity profiles, looking for differences in deployment efficiency.
-10.47%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 32.23%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-2.52%
Below half of QCOM's 23.65%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
12.16%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -28.49%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
11.65%
Inventory growth 50-75% of QCOM's 22.15%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
2.75%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 8.25%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-0.07%
Below half of QCOM's 10.86%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.55%
Below half QCOM's 0.22%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.70%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.61%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.70%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.61%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.65%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-33.18%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.66%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.27%
Below half of QCOM's 3.53%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.93%
Below half of QCOM's 7.97%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
128.96%
Less than half of QCOM's -6.82%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-60.19%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.45%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
12.29%
Less than half of QCOM's -39.42%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-13.24%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -2.98%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.12%
Less than half of QCOM's 66.39%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.03%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.86%
Less than half of QCOM's -86.13%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.14%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.14%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.07%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.00%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
Below half QCOM's 39.91%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-18.15%
Less than half of QCOM's 47.94%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.05%
Below half QCOM's 9.44%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.93%
Below half QCOM's 7.97%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
24.29%
Below half QCOM's 50.65%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-20.32%
Less than half of QCOM's 66.39%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-129.08%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -11.50%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.