205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-7.46%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-7.46% vs QCOM's -9.80%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
13.73%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 46.53%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
6.76%
Below half of QCOM's 16.56%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.69%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 16.07%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-0.50%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -18.59%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.71%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 25.01%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
5.38%
Below half of QCOM's 16.46%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.09%
Below half QCOM's 5.29%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
10.02%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.09%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
11.15%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.09%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
11.15%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.09%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-25.97%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -21.85%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a stronger commitment to long-horizon returns.
15.69%
Less than half of QCOM's -48.79%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
19.74%
Less than half of QCOM's -18.46%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.28%
Below half of QCOM's -18.01%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.09%
Similar yoy to QCOM's 3.06%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
10.89%
Less than half of QCOM's -6.78%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
538.24%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.58%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.14%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 2.70%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
7.58%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 6.37%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
32.18%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 15.60%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-50.31%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -29.34%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.42%
Less than half of QCOM's 11.49%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-27.40%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -10.18%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.60%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.75%
Below half QCOM's 16.73%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
44.49%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 36.87%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm has more exposure to market fluctuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.44%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 2.63%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.09%
Similar yoy to QCOM's 3.06%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
1.50%
Below half QCOM's 40.24%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-4.68%
Less than half of QCOM's 35.57%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
24.65%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 13.54%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.