205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
3.14%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 3.20%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity profiles, looking for differences in deployment efficiency.
0.04%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -4.52%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
1.32%
Below half of QCOM's -1.84%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
1.81%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 50.41%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
5.53%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 12.83%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-3.43%
Similar to QCOM's -3.46%. Walter Schloss would confirm standard short-term asset patterns.
2.37%
0.75-0.9x QCOM's 2.73%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
-1.39%
Below half QCOM's 7.41%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.56%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.02%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.56%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.02%. Michael Burry sees potential overpaying or intangible bubble risk. Check synergy assumptions.
-2.36%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-4.03%
Less than half of QCOM's -31.64%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-0.37%
Less than half of QCOM's 31.08%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.32%
Below half of QCOM's 14.02%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.54%
Below half of QCOM's 5.93%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-3.19%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.54%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-97.59%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
254.29%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
13.66%
Below half of QCOM's -7.21%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
254.29%
Less than half of QCOM's -4.98%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-15.31%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.86%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.53%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.78%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.28%
Less than half of QCOM's 22.72%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.10%
Similar yoy to QCOM's -2.09%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.27%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -1.18%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.12%
Below half QCOM's 25.00%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
5.32%
Less than half of QCOM's -56.69%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.68%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 6.84%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
0.54%
Below half QCOM's 5.93%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-0.19%
Below half QCOM's -4.52%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-51.52%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-54.98%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -3.20%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.