PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
59.38%
Cash & equivalents growing 59.38% while QCOM's declined -39.56%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
59.60%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 36.45%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
59.51%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 8.70%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-13.69%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -35.27%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-7.37%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 40.65%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
22.84%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -13.99%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
22.79%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 1.74%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-4.88%
Below half QCOM's 14.27%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel M&A strategies or intangible expansions.
-0.73%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.12%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-0.73%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.12%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-5.67%
Less than half of QCOM's 100.26%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-57.28%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-22.06%
Below half of QCOM's 15.22%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Below half of QCOM's 5.85%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-64.39%
Less than half of QCOM's 19.26%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
10.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
457.21%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 7.75%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
63.71%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 7.24%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
1.74%
Less than half of QCOM's 10.92%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.34%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.51%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.10%
Less than half of QCOM's -5.56%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.82%
50-75% of QCOM's -4.49%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.15%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.00%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.14%
Below half QCOM's 11.45%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-5.06%
Less than half of QCOM's -36.32%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.29%
Below half QCOM's 5.72%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.00%
Below half QCOM's 5.85%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
44.14%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 36.45%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if robust new investments are prudent.
-1.04%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-77.30%
Less than half of QCOM's 39.56%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.