205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-30.43%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-30.43% vs QCOM's -6.51%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-11.00%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 4.64%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-19.16%
Below half of QCOM's 2.37%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.88%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 1.30%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
4.15%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -3.14%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.98%
Below half of QCOM's 2.85%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.86%
Below half QCOM's 10.52%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.36%
50-75% of QCOM's 48.03%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
34.36%
50-75% of QCOM's 48.03%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.78%
Less than half of QCOM's -16.84%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-65.48%
Less than half of QCOM's 18.41%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.21%
Below half of QCOM's 15.03%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.69%
Below half of QCOM's 6.89%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
184.96%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.39%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
2790.91%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.55%
Below half of QCOM's 4.07%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
29.06%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 19.95%. Martin Whitman sees a potentially higher near-term liability load.
13.92%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 7.83%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-85.05%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.54%
Less than half of QCOM's 30.43%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-27.69%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.38%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.14%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.27%
Below half QCOM's 14.69%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-3.74%
Less than half of QCOM's 486.67%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.87%
Below half QCOM's 6.98%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-7.69%
Below half QCOM's 6.89%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-3.96%
Below half QCOM's 4.64%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-1.58%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
35.21%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 6.51%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.