PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
14.92%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of QCOM's 44.32%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
-28.59%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -4.61%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
-12.88%
Below half of QCOM's 4.46%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
12.15%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -22.91%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-3.45%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 0.64%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
3.47%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -0.61%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-6.31%
Below half of QCOM's 1.61%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.29%
Below half QCOM's 7.24%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
1.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.82%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.19%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-0.82%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.19%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
1.92%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
24.29%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 20.49%. Bill Ackman wonders if the company booked more losses or deferrals than competitor.
-1.87%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.61%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
0.22%
Below half of QCOM's 3.00%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.72%
Below half of QCOM's 2.11%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-5.98%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -6.49%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
-3.77%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.67%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Below half of QCOM's 2.79%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
24.05%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 10.13%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-3.78%
Less than half of QCOM's 4.25%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.50%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.52%
Less than half of QCOM's 14.17%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-3.69%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.08%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.76%
Less than half of QCOM's 4.65%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.06%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.06%
Below half QCOM's 13.42%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
9.28%
Less than half of QCOM's -51.14%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.70%
Below half QCOM's 1.81%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.72%
Below half QCOM's 2.11%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-26.35%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -4.61%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-3.22%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-19.49%
Less than half of QCOM's -44.32%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.