PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-8.77%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-8.77% vs QCOM's -16.97%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
40.94%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -8.45%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
17.26%
Below half of QCOM's -10.63%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
0.68%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 24.80%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-3.66%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 19.11%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-2.68%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 14.26%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
7.44%
Below half of QCOM's -6.01%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.87%
Below half QCOM's 13.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.33%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.57%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-3.33%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.57%. Michael Burry sees potential overpaying or intangible bubble risk. Check synergy assumptions.
-11.70%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-27.29%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -22.06%. Bill Ackman wonders if the company booked more losses or deferrals than competitor.
-6.35%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.40%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.24%
Below half of QCOM's 5.21%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.44%
Below half of QCOM's -1.96%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-46.18%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.98%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-67.84%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.77%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's -30.38%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
6.45%
Less than half of QCOM's -17.11%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.71%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.59%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.19%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-5.26%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.81%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.91%
Less than half of QCOM's -11.92%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.84%
Below half QCOM's 11.75%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.57%
Less than half of QCOM's -11.63%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.58%
Below half QCOM's -0.75%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
3.44%
Below half QCOM's -1.96%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
35.59%
Below half QCOM's -8.45%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.83%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.38%
50-75% of QCOM's 16.97%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.