PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.36%
Cash & equivalents declining -37.36% while QCOM's grows 52.21%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
24.54%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 2.78%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
1.60%
Below half of QCOM's 14.54%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-13.94%
Similar receivables growth to QCOM's -14.20%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
9.93%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -5.35%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
91.74%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -6.95%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
0.59%
Below half of QCOM's 9.75%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.88%
Below half QCOM's 12.93%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-25.72%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.76%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-25.72%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.76%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-100.00%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-4.84%
Less than half of QCOM's 15.32%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
174.24%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.49%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.43%
Below half of QCOM's 4.67%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.53%
Below half of QCOM's 7.78%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-11.81%
Less than half of QCOM's 45.17%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.66%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.29%
Below half of QCOM's -5.78%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
975.61%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 32.42%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
4.45%
Less than half of QCOM's 28.45%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
554.55%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.30%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-48.91%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.86%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-9.83%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -2.68%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.48%
Less than half of QCOM's 20.25%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.75%
Below half QCOM's 9.90%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
53.14%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.54%
Below half QCOM's 6.43%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.53%
Below half QCOM's 7.78%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
16.30%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 2.78%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
84.64%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
64.86%
Less than half of QCOM's -52.21%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.