PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-40.77%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-40.77% vs QCOM's -23.82%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-28.52%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 20.75%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-31.32%
Below half of QCOM's 6.66%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
9.10%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 33.82%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-2.12%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 10.17%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.63%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -5.75%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-12.06%
Below half of QCOM's 7.80%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.80%
Below half QCOM's 12.92%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.43%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
30.63%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.76%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.78%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-44.62%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.39%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.41%
Below half of QCOM's 7.30%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.80%
Below half of QCOM's 7.61%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
2.56%
Less than half of QCOM's 14.63%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -8.59%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-50.45%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.23%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-10.70%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.41%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-11.67%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.09%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.80%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.33%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-9.62%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.41%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.43%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.13%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.00%
Below half QCOM's 10.91%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.22%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.86%
Below half QCOM's 7.67%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-6.80%
Below half QCOM's 7.61%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-22.69%
Below half QCOM's 20.75%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-51.89%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
27.60%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 23.82%. Bill Ackman questions if net debt is increasing faster than competitor.