PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-14.78%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-14.78% vs QCOM's -35.08%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-31.01%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -17.06%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
-26.21%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x QCOM's -21.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
8.29%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 22.14%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
11.69%
Inventory growth 50-75% of QCOM's 18.81%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
3.73%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 9.51%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-11.96%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's -16.02%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
0.13%
Below half QCOM's 11.37%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.55%
Less than half of QCOM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-0.72%
Less than half of QCOM's 21.41%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-6.72%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-3.97%
Less than half of QCOM's -11.86%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
17.81%
50-75% of QCOM's 28.13%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
0.46%
Below half of QCOM's 20.04%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.18%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.98%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-5.58%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.15%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.30%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.55%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 10.00%. Walter Schloss notes parallel approach to deferred revenue.
-48.01%
Less than half of QCOM's 26.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-12.72%
Less than half of QCOM's 16.99%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.67%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.89%
Less than half of QCOM's 29.83%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-7.84%
Less than half of QCOM's 19.56%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.17%
Less than half of QCOM's 17.55%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.03%
Below half QCOM's 8.41%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
48.89%
Less than half of QCOM's -118.97%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.95%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -3.00%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-7.18%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.98%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
2.52%
Below half QCOM's -17.06%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.17%
Less than half of QCOM's 35.08%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.