205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.43%
Cash & equivalents declining -18.43% while QCOM's grows 64.84%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-6.43%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -19.83%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-10.25%
Below half of QCOM's 3.95%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-1.01%
Similar receivables growth to QCOM's -1.00%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-1.95%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 32.00%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
44.30%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 8.20%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-0.27%
Below half of QCOM's 4.68%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.77%
Below half QCOM's 5.20%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.31%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.56%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's 7.32%. Martin Whitman worried about intangible heavy expansions vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.45%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -13.87%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
-65.34%
Less than half of QCOM's 14.27%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.62%
Below half of QCOM's 9.81%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Below half of QCOM's 7.43%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-1.79%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.14%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.09%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 28.43%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-69.74%
Less than half of QCOM's 28.45%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-13.04%
Less than half of QCOM's 23.63%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.52%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
38.59%
50-75% of QCOM's 69.46%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
34.15%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 6.58%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.01%
Less than half of QCOM's 20.03%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.78%
Below half QCOM's 7.36%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.20%
Less than half of QCOM's 210.94%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.68%
Below half QCOM's 5.74%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.29%
Below half QCOM's 7.43%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
3.43%
Below half QCOM's -19.83%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.12%
Less than half of QCOM's -64.84%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.