205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-36.26%
Cash & equivalents declining -36.26% while QCOM's grows 10.83%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
23.63%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 12.32%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
2.46%
Below half of QCOM's 11.56%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
6.64%
Similar receivables growth to QCOM's 7.00%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
1.83%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 14.12%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-34.51%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 24.46%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.03%
Below half of QCOM's 12.01%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.08%
Below half QCOM's 3.10%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.51%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 0.15%. Michael Burry warns of potential big write-downs if synergy fails.
-6.91%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.88%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.15%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
4.33%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
4.94%
Less than half of QCOM's -7.20%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-12.00%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.56%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.22%
Below half of QCOM's 2.42%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.11%
Below half of QCOM's 6.91%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.54%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.72%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.72%
Less than half of QCOM's 30.28%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
3.89%
Less than half of QCOM's 15.33%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.99%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.07%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.63%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.51%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.41%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.04%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.06%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.57%
Below half QCOM's 7.99%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.11%
Below half QCOM's 6.00%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.11%
Below half QCOM's 6.91%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
21.72%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 12.32%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.26%
Less than half of QCOM's -10.83%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.