205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-39.01%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-39.01% vs QCOM's -38.05%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
437.41%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 25.44%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
27.45%
Below half of QCOM's -3.07%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-48.53%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 340.35%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-12.70%
Similar inventory growth to QCOM's -15.70%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
2.36%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -17.43%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-6.79%
Below half of QCOM's 29.38%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-6.06%
Below half QCOM's 13.08%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.30%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.45%
Less than half of QCOM's 204.01%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-8.93%
Both QCOM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
43.90%
Less than half of QCOM's -4.60%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-61.78%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -16.15%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-1.93%
Below half of QCOM's 21.87%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.36%
Below half of QCOM's 25.34%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-46.09%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -12.71%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.29%
Below half of QCOM's 33.33%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's -9.28%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-11.85%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.53%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.46%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.97%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 4.48%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
67.98%
Less than half of QCOM's 555.76%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.49%
Less than half of QCOM's 138.87%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.17%
Below half QCOM's 6.07%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-130.99%
Less than half of QCOM's -365.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.61%
Below half QCOM's 6.64%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-4.36%
Below half QCOM's 25.34%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
115.78%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 25.44%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.01%
Similar yoy changes to QCOM's 43.87%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net leverage strategies.