205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-8.66%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-8.66% vs QCOM's -26.98%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
13.70%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 35.61%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
3.47%
Below half of QCOM's 12.03%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-11.01%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -25.77%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.71%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 20.80%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-7.77%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -34.71%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-0.39%
Below half of QCOM's 7.15%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
7.23%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.29%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.25%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -2.33%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.60%
Similar yoy changes to QCOM's -2.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
1.59%
Below half of QCOM's 15.03%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-0.22%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.55%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
49.35%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 4.27%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
4.16%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 6.39%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Below half of QCOM's 6.74%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
7.71%
50-75% of QCOM's 13.37%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.51%
Below half of QCOM's -82.13%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.51%
Less than half of QCOM's 18.59%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -1.81%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
11.67%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
60.13%
Less than half of QCOM's -22.69%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.87%
Less than half of QCOM's -6.78%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.76%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.81%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.34%
Below half QCOM's 4.84%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
8.41%
Less than half of QCOM's 8300.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.01%
Below half QCOM's 8.58%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.81%
Below half QCOM's 6.74%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
10.19%
Below half QCOM's 25.63%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.66%
Less than half of QCOM's 26.98%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.