PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-6.49%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-6.49% vs QCOM's -30.25%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-25.86%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 1.16%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-17.41%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -8.29%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
12.39%
Receivables growth 1.1-1.25x QCOM's 10.39%. Bill Ackman would demand reasons for extending more credit than the competitor.
5.72%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 14.86%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
1.80%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -6.76%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-3.05%
Below half of QCOM's -6.79%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.47%
Below half QCOM's -0.42%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.21%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -1.56%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible investment patterns.
-0.32%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.21%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-13.10%
Below half of QCOM's 4.33%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
2.46%
Less than half of QCOM's 23.08%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-26.32%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.19%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.21%
Below half of QCOM's 3.37%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.67%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -1.40%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
-2.52%
Less than half of QCOM's 31.33%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.32%
Below half of QCOM's 66.81%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.53%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.96%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.94%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.96%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.10%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.96%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.37%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.08%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.01%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 4.20%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-4.31%
Less than half of QCOM's 10.22%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.51%
Below half QCOM's -2.96%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.67%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -1.40%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-22.17%
Below half QCOM's 2.57%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.49%
Less than half of QCOM's 30.25%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.