205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.25%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.25% vs QCOM's -4.94%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
87.37%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's 24.25%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
12.11%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x QCOM's 8.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
-13.40%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 19.35%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-9.01%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 1.59%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
12.24%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 69.81%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
1.45%
Below half of QCOM's 11.38%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.15%
Below half QCOM's 6.48%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.02%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.42%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
-3.63%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.03%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.51%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.78%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-24.29%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -2.44%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
-35.41%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -9.61%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
-1.02%
Less than half of QCOM's -4.72%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.96%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.62%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.96%
Below half of QCOM's 3.77%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.32%
Less than half of QCOM's 27.33%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-12.93%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -8.97%. Martin Whitman is cautious about near-term obligations overshadowing competitor's level.
68.33%
Below half of QCOM's -78.57%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
68.33%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 12.75%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
107.52%
Less than half of QCOM's -10.67%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-4.61%
Less than half of QCOM's 18.48%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.09%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.16%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.42%
Less than half of QCOM's -12.06%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.69%
50-75% of QCOM's -4.01%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.40%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.40%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.39%
Below half QCOM's 4.43%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-12.46%
Less than half of QCOM's -52.55%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Below half QCOM's 2.59%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.96%
Below half QCOM's 3.77%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
59.19%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 6.74%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-3.60%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.97%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
9.00%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 4.00%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.