205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-1.62%
Cash & equivalents declining -1.62% while QCOM's grows 12.77%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-3.14%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 4.84%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-2.60%
Below half of QCOM's 7.28%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
8.37%
Receivables growth 50-75% of QCOM's 12.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
-3.24%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 23.98%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
122.20%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 16.62%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-0.82%
Below half of QCOM's 9.32%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.42%
Below half QCOM's 0.81%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.15%
50-75% of QCOM's -3.81%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-0.82%
50-75% of QCOM's -1.46%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
-5.12%
Below half of QCOM's 4.38%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-5.71%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's -6.02%. Walter Schloss sees comparable tax asset changes or loss usage.
-11.49%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -5.60%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-2.50%
Below half of QCOM's 1.36%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
Below half of QCOM's 4.25%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.90%
Less than half of QCOM's 27.66%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.66%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-88.97%
Below half of QCOM's 34.50%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-66.94%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's -28.55%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-10.45%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -5.60%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.07%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
66.97%
50-75% of QCOM's 126.76%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
0.16%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.89%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.21%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.46%
Below half QCOM's 7.11%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
7.01%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 1.62%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.08%
Below half QCOM's 5.40%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.81%
Below half QCOM's 4.25%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-3.29%
Below half QCOM's 4.55%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.05%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.47%
Less than half of QCOM's -12.77%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.