205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-15.29%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-15.29% vs QCOM's -4.66%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-16.40%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 4.65%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-16.00%
Below half of QCOM's 1.64%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
11.85%
Similar receivables growth to QCOM's 15.25%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
1.18%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 16.21%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
1.81%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -1.32%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.04%
Below half of QCOM's 3.88%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.42%
Below half QCOM's 3.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.60%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -3.22%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm invests more in intangible IP or capitalizes R&D aggressively.
-1.36%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.67%. Michael Burry sees potential overpaying or intangible bubble risk. Check synergy assumptions.
-0.49%
Below half of QCOM's 12.92%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-4.17%
50-75% of QCOM's -7.39%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower deferred tax growth.
34.74%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 11.33%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-1.18%
Below half of QCOM's 7.55%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.54%
Below half of QCOM's 6.15%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.68%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.75%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-33.33%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
Below half of QCOM's -29.88%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
26.70%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 22.28%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
-9.90%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.15%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.43%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.34%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.39%
Less than half of QCOM's 4.66%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.97%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.04%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.79%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.10%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.27%
Below half QCOM's 6.44%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
9.23%
50-75% of QCOM's 16.02%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.06%
Below half QCOM's 6.44%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.54%
Below half QCOM's 6.15%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-15.19%
Below half QCOM's 9.83%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-9.11%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.11%
Less than half of QCOM's 5.17%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.