205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-22.30%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-22.30% vs QCOM's -23.58%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-35.63%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 14.50%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-30.46%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -3.77%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
12.69%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 67.07%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
1.75%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 7.80%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.86%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 11.16%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-10.81%
Below half of QCOM's 2.05%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.25%
Below half QCOM's 0.43%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.99%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.39%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.36%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.33%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
3.30%
Below half of QCOM's 7.64%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-3.00%
Less than half of QCOM's -13.74%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
0.81%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.09%
Below half of QCOM's 4.55%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.94%
Below half of QCOM's 3.44%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.74%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-74.60%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.92%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.92%
Below half of QCOM's 32.98%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
33.15%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 8.11%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-27.03%
Less than half of QCOM's 11.07%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-5.55%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.70%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.69%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-3.78%
50-75% of QCOM's -5.79%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
-5.18%
Similar yoy to QCOM's -5.61%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.68%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.97%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Below half QCOM's 5.09%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
1.54%
Less than half of QCOM's 3.32%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.45%
Below half QCOM's 3.31%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-5.94%
Below half QCOM's 3.44%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-32.55%
Below half QCOM's 10.28%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-17.76%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -7.14%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-16.03%
Less than half of QCOM's 23.60%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.