205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
3.59%
Cash & equivalents growing 3.59% while QCOM's declined -20.01%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-11.96%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 18.69%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-6.69%
Below half of QCOM's 1.27%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
11.88%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -7.17%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.36%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 20.78%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.98%
Below half of QCOM's 1.55%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.89%
Below half QCOM's 1.77%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.53%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -3.22%. Martin Whitman sees potential overreliance on intangible expansions vs. competitor.
-1.42%
50-75% of QCOM's -2.24%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
3.57%
Below half of QCOM's -4.44%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
1.16%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.20%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-37.20%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.92%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.01%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -1.82%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.12%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.26%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-1.14%
Less than half of QCOM's 13.70%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.10%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.63%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-78.39%
Below half of QCOM's 12.74%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-46.11%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.40%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-14.12%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.08%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -6.88%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
1.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
68.21%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 7.48%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
0.45%
Less than half of QCOM's -5.07%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.84%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.34%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.99%
Below half QCOM's 4.10%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.19%
Less than half of QCOM's -32.49%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Below half QCOM's -0.88%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.12%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.26%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-10.60%
Below half QCOM's 4.82%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.09%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.37%
Less than half of QCOM's 20.01%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.