PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-4.67%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-4.67% vs QCOM's -13.17%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
2.91%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -12.21%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
0.06%
Below half of QCOM's -12.55%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
2.87%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -8.08%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.22%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 5.68%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
2.06%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 30.11%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
4.78%
Below half of QCOM's -8.88%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.65%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.32%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.75%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.60%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.44%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.58%. Michael Burry sees potential overpaying or intangible bubble risk. Check synergy assumptions.
-1.72%
Below half of QCOM's 1.74%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-2.87%
Less than half of QCOM's -21.07%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-4.29%
Less than half of QCOM's 75.84%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.89%
Below half of QCOM's 2.91%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.07%
Below half of QCOM's -2.63%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-3.47%
Less than half of QCOM's -32.19%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
75.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
56.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
56.00%
Below half of QCOM's -12.09%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
37.11%
Less than half of QCOM's -17.05%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
39.68%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.68%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-13.85%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.91%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.03%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.35%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-11.87%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -1.64%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.02%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.00%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.13%
Similar yoy to QCOM's 1.09%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
3.20%
Less than half of QCOM's 10.28%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.58%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's -2.53%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
1.07%
Below half QCOM's -2.63%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
2.44%
Below half QCOM's -4.59%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
5.30%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.95%
Less than half of QCOM's 30.50%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.