205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-4.31%
Cash & equivalents declining -4.31% while QCOM's grows 81.85%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
-24.51%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 12.73%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-17.27%
Below half of QCOM's 37.13%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.28%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -4.71%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-6.05%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -14.94%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
2.88%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -16.82%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-9.57%
Below half of QCOM's 25.01%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.09%
Below half QCOM's 2.02%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.93%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -3.10%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.44%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-5.26%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -1.15%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
-5.33%
Less than half of QCOM's 21.54%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-24.66%
Less than half of QCOM's 1.24%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.33%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.25%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.66%
Below half of QCOM's 10.86%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-11.99%
50-75% of QCOM's -16.10%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
-42.86%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -8.76%. Michael Burry sees a major discrepancy in short-term leverage. Check coverage and liquidity carefully.
-28.21%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-28.21%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -12.60%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
27.69%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 22.81%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
-21.70%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -1.39%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.06%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.24%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.20%
Less than half of QCOM's 4.77%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.55%
Less than half of QCOM's 310.60%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Less than half of QCOM's 104.51%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.47%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 0.89%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
0.19%
Less than half of QCOM's 6.57%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.30%
Below half QCOM's -12.25%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-5.66%
Below half QCOM's 10.86%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-22.64%
Below half QCOM's 4.64%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-15.40%
Less than half of QCOM's 895.71%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-18.95%
Less than half of QCOM's 121.06%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.