PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.59%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-3.59% vs QCOM's -16.46%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-14.15%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 10.53%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-9.32%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -0.76%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
6.23%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 31.37%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.93%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 17.35%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
17.96%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -53.58%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
0.45%
Below half of QCOM's -0.89%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.12%
Below half QCOM's -3.74%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.14%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's -4.23%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm invests more in intangible IP or capitalizes R&D aggressively.
-1.35%
50-75% of QCOM's -1.89%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
1.82%
Below half of QCOM's -3.42%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
32.00%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 36.32%. Walter Schloss sees comparable tax asset changes or loss usage.
-3.75%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.19%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.25%
Below half of QCOM's 0.04%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Below half of QCOM's -0.34%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
7.49%
Similar yoy growth to QCOM's 6.84%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
-49.00%
Less than half of QCOM's 94.90%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-13.43%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.43%
Below half of QCOM's 23.79%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
45.00%
Less than half of QCOM's -21.49%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-17.73%
Less than half of QCOM's 8.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
3.69%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.26%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.65%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.83%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
7.35%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.71%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.93%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.14%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.25%
Below half QCOM's -2.28%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.94%
Less than half of QCOM's 131.88%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.84%
Below half QCOM's -1.97%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.04%
Below half QCOM's -0.34%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-12.13%
Below half QCOM's 2.24%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-12.29%
Less than half of QCOM's 9.06%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-16.21%
Less than half of QCOM's 52.76%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.