205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
3.68%
Cash & equivalents growing 3.68% while QCOM's declined -4.76%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-16.03%
Short-term investments yoy growth ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -10.44%. David Dodd would see a more robust near-cash position, but confirm efficient allocation.
-8.73%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x QCOM's -5.11%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
13.77%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -15.94%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.83%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -8.01%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-0.49%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 3.24%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-1.65%
Below half of QCOM's -6.03%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.70%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 0.25%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.33%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -5.06%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.62%
Similar yoy changes to QCOM's -1.68%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
1.12%
Below half of QCOM's 250.16%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-17.42%
Less than half of QCOM's -57.21%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
23.13%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 3.38%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
0.10%
Below half of QCOM's 6.81%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.77%
Below half of QCOM's -1.73%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
4.72%
Less than half of QCOM's -14.51%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.91%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.91%
Below half of QCOM's -2.99%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-10.63%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.47%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-17.63%
Less than half of QCOM's 10.27%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.03%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.09%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-87.29%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -4.84%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
-32.05%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.29%
Less than half of QCOM's 192.48%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.83%
Less than half of QCOM's 19.16%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.02%
Less than half of QCOM's 16.37%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
Below half QCOM's -22.65%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-2.08%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.52%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.95%
Below half QCOM's -22.19%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.77%
Below half QCOM's -1.73%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-14.54%
Below half QCOM's 82.81%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.02%
Less than half of QCOM's 4.35%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-2.48%
Less than half of QCOM's 19.95%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.