PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-48.54%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-48.54% vs QCOM's -6.13%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
63.32%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -82.09%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
-0.33%
Below half of QCOM's -9.25%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
2.19%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -10.52%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
1.24%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -0.67%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-20.34%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 439.78%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-1.29%
Below half of QCOM's -2.69%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
6.87%
Below half QCOM's -4.68%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.80%
1.25-1.5x QCOM's -7.60%. Martin Whitman sees potential overreliance on intangible expansions vs. competitor.
-1.66%
50-75% of QCOM's -3.04%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
2.58%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
18.54%
Less than half of QCOM's -25.04%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
4.52%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.71%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.90%
Below half of QCOM's -4.36%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.25%
Below half of QCOM's -3.17%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
50-75% of QCOM's -22.09%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a relatively controlled tax liability increase.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.99%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.06%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
62.48%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 28.06%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-14.77%
50-75% of QCOM's -20.57%. Bruce Berkowitz notes less new LT debt than competitor.
4.88%
Below half QCOM's -5.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
-14.00%
50-75% of QCOM's -18.86%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
0.23%
Less than half of QCOM's -11.71%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-11.70%
50-75% of QCOM's -17.50%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.08%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.19%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.65%
Below half QCOM's -0.15%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
4.58%
Less than half of QCOM's -40.73%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.11%
Below half QCOM's -3.15%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.25%
Below half QCOM's -3.17%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
56.69%
Below half QCOM's -80.36%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.02%
Less than half of QCOM's -2.65%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
66.05%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 11.54%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.