PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.40%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.40% vs QCOM's -14.97%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
151.28%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -3.22%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
6.32%
Below half of QCOM's -14.61%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-19.97%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 3.39%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.91%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -21.08%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
13.26%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -7.04%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
0.55%
Below half of QCOM's -12.70%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.45%
Below half QCOM's 1.45%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.42%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -7.57%. Michael Burry might suspect inflated intangible valuations or questionable M&A additions.
-1.20%
50-75% of QCOM's -2.36%. Bruce Berkowitz notes lower intangible reliance than competitor.
0.67%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
-23.35%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.05%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
18.89%
Less than half of QCOM's 156.14%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.24%
Below half of QCOM's 8.46%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.14%
Below half of QCOM's -3.45%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-2.27%
Less than half of QCOM's -13.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
0.20%
Less than half of QCOM's -16.80%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-20.69%
50-75% of QCOM's -28.14%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a relatively controlled tax liability increase.
-20.69%
Below half of QCOM's 7.21%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
17.24%
Less than half of QCOM's -14.76%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
5.78%
Less than half of QCOM's -17.67%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.02%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.08%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-24.39%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -7.27%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
59.18%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.23%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-2.11%
Less than half of QCOM's 40.54%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.17%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.27%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.15%
Less than half of QCOM's -2.17%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
Below half QCOM's -4.72%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
21.67%
Less than half of QCOM's -48.72%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.87%
Below half QCOM's -10.14%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.14%
Below half QCOM's -3.45%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
120.79%
Below half QCOM's -3.22%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.03%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.00%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
76.42%
1.1-1.25x QCOM's 63.56%. Bill Ackman questions if net debt is increasing faster than competitor.