205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
49.43%
Cash & equivalents growing 49.43% while QCOM's declined -15.21%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-11.85%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's 5.82%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
10.53%
Below half of QCOM's -6.28%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
0.44%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -19.33%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.80%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 4.55%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
38.78%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's -4.41%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
7.42%
Below half of QCOM's -7.54%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
7.20%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.79%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.44%
Less than half of QCOM's 7.85%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-1.35%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.44%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
8.09%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.51%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.45%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-1.07%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.91%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.08%
Below half of QCOM's 6.68%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.91%
Below half of QCOM's -0.83%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.53%
50-75% of QCOM's 4.90%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.51%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -7.55%. Michael Burry questions if there's an abrupt jump in tax obligations or poor payment scheduling.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.54%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
29.47%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.66%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-7.97%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.03%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
0.77%
Below half QCOM's -12.58%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
-1.14%
Less than half of QCOM's -7.55%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.74%
50-75% of QCOM's -2.50%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
-6.74%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -0.97%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.24%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.18%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.30%
Similar yoy to QCOM's 2.42%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
6.92%
Less than half of QCOM's -4.10%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.71%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 0.60%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.91%
Below half QCOM's -0.83%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-11.85%
Below half QCOM's 5.82%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.02%
50-75% of QCOM's 0.03%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively smaller yoy debt additions.
-31.67%
Less than half of QCOM's 12.48%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.