205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-24.31%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-24.31% vs QCOM's -7.15%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
23.73%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -11.23%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
0.88%
Below half of QCOM's -8.89%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.53%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's 12.66%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.85%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's 19.61%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.49%
Other current assets growth < half of QCOM's 19.32%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
2.37%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 0.73%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
5.80%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 3.60%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
Less than half of QCOM's -5.83%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.13%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.77%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-87.24%
0.75-0.9x QCOM's -100.00%. Bill Ackman might question if competitor invests more confidently in future returns.
3.80%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.61%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
40.51%
50-75% of QCOM's 57.60%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
2.50%
Below half of QCOM's 6.77%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.43%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 3.83%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-1.84%
Less than half of QCOM's 28.22%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
234.71%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 95.71%. Michael Burry questions if there's an abrupt jump in tax obligations or poor payment scheduling.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.98%
Less than half of QCOM's 21.32%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-1.60%
Less than half of QCOM's 2.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.01%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.05%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's -29.40%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
8.05%
Less than half of QCOM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
31.23%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 8.32%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-0.49%
Similar yoy to QCOM's -0.65%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.63%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
Below half QCOM's 14.79%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.55%
Less than half of QCOM's -54.69%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.13%
Below half QCOM's 13.90%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.43%
0.5-0.75x QCOM's 3.83%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
23.73%
Below half QCOM's -11.23%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
0.01%
Less than half of QCOM's 0.03%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
36.24%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 5.96%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.