205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-23.19%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-23.19% vs QCOM's -27.45%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
20.62%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of QCOM's -7.06%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
0.07%
Below half of QCOM's -18.96%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.21%
Receivables growth less than half of QCOM's -6.79%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
13.41%
Inventory growth below half of QCOM's -1.07%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-11.50%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -6.10%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
3.27%
Below half of QCOM's -9.60%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
11.22%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 1.27%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Less than half of QCOM's -3.84%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.07%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.45%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
531.03%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating better performance.
10.49%
50-75% of QCOM's 18.40%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower deferred tax growth.
10.56%
Less than half of QCOM's -0.24%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
8.65%
≥ 1.5x QCOM's 1.29%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.88%
Below half of QCOM's -3.30%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-3.05%
Less than half of QCOM's -44.18%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-40.20%
50-75% of QCOM's -65.49%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm is less reliant on near-term borrowing than competitor.
-67.47%
Above 1.5x QCOM's -26.36%. Michael Burry questions if there's an abrupt jump in tax obligations or poor payment scheduling.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.64%
Exceeding 1.5x QCOM's 2.52%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-6.65%
Less than half of QCOM's -21.97%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
13.44%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 0.36%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.48%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to QCOM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.46%
Similar yoy changes to QCOM's -6.78%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in other LT liabilities.
10.97%
Less than half of QCOM's -1.54%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.31%
Less than half of QCOM's -8.14%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.16%
Below half QCOM's 4.12%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
2.38%
Less than half of QCOM's 42.66%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.57%
Similar yoy to QCOM's 4.72%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
5.88%
Below half QCOM's -3.30%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
20.62%
Below half QCOM's -7.06%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
10.79%
Less than half of QCOM's -5.29%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
37.72%
Above 1.5x QCOM's 3.55%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.