205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ADI's 30.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -0.77%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -28.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ADI is 53.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
16.46%
Inventory growth of 16.46% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-2988.89%
Negative yoy usage while ADI is 53.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x ADI's 23.40%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
11.22%
Some CapEx rise while ADI is negative at -60.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -51.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
13.68%
We have some liquidation growth while ADI is negative at -29.24%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while ADI is 259.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
7.96%
We have mild expansions while ADI is negative at -299.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
64.29%
We slightly raise equity while ADI is negative at -26.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
34.30%
Buyback growth of 34.30% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.