205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Net income growth above 1.5x ADI's 20.96%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-1.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ADI at -0.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-13.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 69.43%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ADI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-34.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ADI is 597.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-56.14%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-804.76%
Negative yoy usage while ADI is 597.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2998.00%
Both negative yoy, with ADI at -97.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
14.72%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of ADI's 17.05%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
8.33%
Some CapEx rise while ADI is negative at -41.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
84.18%
Acquisition growth of 84.18% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-165.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 55.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-15.46%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ADI at -39.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
49700.00%
We have some outflow growth while ADI is negative at -90.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
146.91%
Investing outflow well above ADI's 106.17%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
11.58%
Debt repayment well below ADI's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-3.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -45.73%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
27.99%
We have some buyback growth while ADI is negative at -90.02%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.