205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Some net income increase while ADI is negative at -18.19%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.03%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -0.63%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ADI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
70.93%
Less working capital growth vs. ADI's 932.18%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-153.57%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
60.21%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. ADI's 932.18%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
686.67%
Well above ADI's 118.94%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
62.09%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ADI's 14.64%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
2.79%
Some CapEx rise while ADI is negative at -5.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-74.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 13.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.73%
We have some liquidation growth while ADI is negative at -23.12%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -317.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-188.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -62.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
Stock issuance far above ADI's 119.46%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
13.42%
We have some buyback growth while ADI is negative at -9.41%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.