205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while ADI stands at 7.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ADI at -0.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
155.56%
Well above ADI's 3.65% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-5.33%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ADI at -29.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
131.94%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -99.95%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
81.25%
AR growth of 81.25% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
70.00%
Inventory growth of 70.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
52.78%
AP growth of 52.78% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
261.70%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -99.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
833.33%
Well above ADI's 248.97%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
70.77%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -12.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -14.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
27.84%
Acquisition growth of 27.84% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
58.49%
Purchases well above ADI's 3.61%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.92%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ADI at -5.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-24.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -222.18%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-168.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -8.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.75%
Issuance growth of 1.75% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while ADI is 184.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.