205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.25%
Net income growth above 1.5x ADI's 22.84%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while ADI is 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-54.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 135.68%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ADI at -7.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
34.11%
Less working capital growth vs. ADI's 160.21%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-10.74%
AR is negative yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-276.47%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
49.57%
AP growth of 49.57% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
99.28%
Growth well above ADI's 160.21%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
81.82%
Well above ADI's 51.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
67.75%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x ADI's 51.41%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-3.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 8.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.51%
Some yoy expansion while ADI is negative at -1.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
64.84%
We have some liquidation growth while ADI is negative at -3.89%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-302.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -71.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
362.95%
We have mild expansions while ADI is negative at -283.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-100.80%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-55.83%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.19%
We cut yoy buybacks while ADI is 74.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.