PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.94%
Some net income increase while ADI is negative at -3.64%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.33%
Less D&A growth vs. ADI's 8.90%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
52.63%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -697.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-19.48%
Negative yoy SBC while ADI is 27.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
165.88%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -72.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.45%
AR growth of 125.45% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
76.67%
Inventory growth of 76.67% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
18.64%
AP growth of 18.64% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
18200.00%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -72.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
130.00%
Some yoy increase while ADI is negative at -175.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
78.45%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -10.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-28.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 3.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
28.75%
Acquisition growth of 28.75% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-69.64%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 54.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-68.16%
We reduce yoy sales while ADI is 44.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-18.18%
We reduce yoy other investing while ADI is 94.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-147.76%
We reduce yoy invests while ADI stands at 158.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.60%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
9.83%
We have some buyback growth while ADI is negative at -153.80%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.