205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Net income growth above 1.5x ADI's 5.43%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.06%
Negative yoy D&A while ADI is 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
12.28%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -164.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-21.43%
Negative yoy SBC while ADI is 1.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
231.82%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -190.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-17.50%
AR is negative yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
378.05%
Inventory growth of 378.05% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -190.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while ADI is 72.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.83%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -42.70%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-11.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
11.20%
Acquisition growth of 11.20% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.05%
Purchases well above ADI's 15.51%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
13.95%
We have some liquidation growth while ADI is negative at -10.15%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-14.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while ADI is 73.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
323.56%
Investing outflow well above ADI's 45.11%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-31.37%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -29.10%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.