205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.69%
Some net income increase while ADI is negative at -26.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.30%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. ADI's 223.17%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-28.00%
Negative yoy SBC while ADI is 45.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
140.76%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -492.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
19.70%
AR growth of 19.70% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
137.50%
Inventory growth of 137.50% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
291.67%
AP growth of 291.67% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
205.85%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -160.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-110.00%
Negative yoy while ADI is 29.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
87.79%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -169.86%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -35.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
23.18%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. ADI's 100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-7.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 99.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-27.27%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ADI at -62.75%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-32.87%
We reduce yoy other investing while ADI is 82.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-6000.00%
We reduce yoy invests while ADI stands at 104.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ADI's 48.26%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-9.52%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.