PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ADI's 9.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
4.29%
D&A growth well above ADI's 0.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 95.27%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-37.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ADI at -5.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
94.19%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -122.04%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
64.95%
AR growth of 64.95% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
55.17%
Inventory growth of 55.17% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
750.00%
AP growth of 750.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1.97%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -129.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
95.24%
Some yoy increase while ADI is negative at -31.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.33%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -13.61%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-48.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
48.59%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. ADI's 99.04%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-155.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.73%
Liquidation growth of 24.73% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-58.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -999.20%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2082.72%
We reduce yoy invests while ADI stands at 48.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ADI's 64.17%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-46.08%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-17.88%
We cut yoy buybacks while ADI is 45.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.