205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ADI's 31.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-0.40%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ADI at -0.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
11.76%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -53.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.52%
SBC growth while ADI is negative at -4.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
106.69%
Well above ADI's 53.29% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
157.85%
AR growth of 157.85% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-6550.00%
Negative yoy inventory while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
23.73%
AP growth of 23.73% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
87.54%
Growth well above ADI's 53.29%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
125.00%
Some yoy increase while ADI is negative at -96.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
102.12%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ADI's 22.71%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
19.25%
Some CapEx rise while ADI is negative at -9.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Purchases growth of 61.46% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
10.50%
Liquidation growth of 10.50% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2380.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -1400.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
73.97%
We have mild expansions while ADI is negative at -12.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
33.24%
Debt repayment growth of 33.24% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-40.41%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
46.25%
We have some buyback growth while ADI is negative at -7.12%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.