PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while ADI stands at 35.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.40%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -0.91%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 65.38%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.54%
Negative yoy SBC while ADI is 10.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-630.56%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ADI is 29.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-254.29%
AR is negative yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
148.12%
Inventory growth of 148.12% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-117.81%
Negative yoy AP while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
40.91%
Growth well above ADI's 29.31%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
100.00%
Well above ADI's 27.57%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-16.10%
Negative yoy CFO while ADI is 29.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-12.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 65.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
12.31%
Acquisition growth of 12.31% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-920.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-71.82%
We reduce yoy sales while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-28.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -812.51%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-252.33%
We reduce yoy invests while ADI stands at 45.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to ADI's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
41.38%
Issuance growth of 41.38% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
98.30%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x ADI's 84.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.