205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ADI at -7.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -2.03%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -373.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
55.88%
SBC growth while ADI is negative at -3.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-227.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ADI is 59.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-38.62%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ADI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.69%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ADI's 100.00%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-670.00%
Negative yoy AP while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-261.98%
Negative yoy usage while ADI is 59.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1650.00%
Negative yoy while ADI is 144.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-47.14%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ADI at -4.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-8.71%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 53.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
6500.00%
Acquisition growth of 6500.00% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-89.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-22.87%
We reduce yoy sales while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-566.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while ADI is 245.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-970.42%
We reduce yoy invests while ADI stands at 54.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -5.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
44.44%
Issuance growth of 44.44% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
95.38%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x ADI's 61.62%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.