205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.45%
Some net income increase while ADI is negative at -34.68%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.25%
D&A growth well above ADI's 0.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-19.72%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ADI stands at 39.11%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.43%
SBC growth while ADI is negative at -16.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
108.15%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -115.44%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-134.48%
AR is negative yoy while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
72.62%
Inventory growth of 72.62% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
232.47%
AP growth of 232.47% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
96.78%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -115.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
102.42%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. ADI's 23889.67%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
54.47%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -29.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
CapEx growth well above ADI's 15.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-98.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
56.87%
Purchases growth of 56.87% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
18.97%
Liquidation growth of 18.97% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.00%
Growth well above ADI's 163.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
100.00%
We have mild expansions while ADI is negative at -174.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
89.93%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x ADI's 60.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
281.54%
Issuance growth of 281.54% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2266.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with ADI at -23.30%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.