205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Net income growth under 50% of ADI's 45.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.44%
Some D&A expansion while ADI is negative at -2.91%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
42.53%
Some yoy growth while ADI is negative at -51.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ADI at -6.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
100.69%
Slight usage while ADI is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
47.52%
AR growth of 47.52% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
21.88%
Inventory growth of 21.88% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
176.03%
AP growth of 176.03% while ADI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
137.09%
Some yoy usage while ADI is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
318.64%
Some yoy increase while ADI is negative at -3810.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
119.08%
Some CFO growth while ADI is negative at -27.27%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.21%
Negative yoy CapEx while ADI is 39.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Negative yoy purchasing while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while ADI is 13785.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-206.54%
We reduce yoy invests while ADI stands at 268.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
259.87%
We repay more while ADI is negative at -200.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-2.54%
Negative yoy issuance while ADI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.75%
We have some buyback growth while ADI is negative at -55.05%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.