PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.73 | 5.46
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.84%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 8.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
13.44%
D&A growth well above AMD's 2.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
42.53%
Well above AMD's 80.24% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while AMD is 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
100.69%
Well above AMD's 175.40% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
47.52%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -55.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
21.88%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 61.73%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
176.03%
Lower AP growth vs. AMD's 389.27%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
137.09%
Growth well above AMD's 35.05%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
318.64%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -1161.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
119.08%
Operating cash flow growth similar to AMD's 114.16%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-16.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -33.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -12.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.97%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-206.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -543.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
259.87%
We repay more while AMD is negative at -200.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-2.54%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
53.75%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x AMD's 32.73%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.