205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
67.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 42.16%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-16.67%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 15.70%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
6.25%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AMD's 64.97%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.12%
Less working capital growth vs. AMD's 483.22%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.41%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -94.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.52%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 155.70%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-96.42%
Both negative yoy, with AMD at -113.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-62.05%
Negative yoy CFO while AMD is 88.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
49.15%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -45.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.20%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -97.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-33.69%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 34.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.66%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -782.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.67%
Negative yoy issuance while AMD is 635.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
1.18%
Buyback growth below 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.