205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
97.89%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -37.44%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.24%
Less D&A growth vs. AMD's 8.73%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-1011.11%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.25%
Less working capital growth vs. AMD's 1585.78%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.23%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -1122.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.96%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 4370.57%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
119.51%
Some yoy increase while AMD is negative at -247.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
45.99%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.12%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-51.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -13.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.58%
Purchases growth of 8.58% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
9.52%
We have some liquidation growth while AMD is negative at -32.36%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Growth well above AMD's 100.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
128.85%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -73.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -4.09%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
93.00%
Buyback growth of 93.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.