205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -28.63%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while AMD is negative at -1.87%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Some yoy growth while AMD is negative at -438.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while AMD is 41.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth well above AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
16.46%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -818.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while AMD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-2988.89%
Negative yoy usage while AMD is 42.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 23.47%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
11.22%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -78.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -376.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
13.68%
Below 50% of AMD's 176.85%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -80.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
7.96%
We have mild expansions while AMD is negative at -117.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
64.29%
Stock issuance far above AMD's 27.73%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
34.30%
Buyback growth of 34.30% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.