205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
52.55%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 164.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-0.55%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with AMD at -4.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-370.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.87%
Well above AMD's 13.06% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
1333.33%
Some inventory rise while AMD is negative at -323.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
67.36%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AMD's 241.19%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
1125.00%
Well above AMD's 5.41%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
58.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.51%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
7.22%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AMD's 41.51%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.02%
Some yoy expansion while AMD is negative at -32.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-1.00%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 153.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-130.95%
We reduce yoy other investing while AMD is 37.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
348.32%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 42.17%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
103.51%
We slightly raise equity while AMD is negative at -49.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.46%
Buyback growth of 13.46% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.