205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Some net income increase while AMD is negative at -51.85%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.58%
Negative yoy D&A while AMD is 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-13.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AMD stands at 219.30%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with AMD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-34.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -135.54%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth well above AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-56.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with AMD at -224.18%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while AMD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-804.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AMD at -104.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-2998.00%
Negative yoy while AMD is 221.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.72%
Some CFO growth while AMD is negative at -61.36%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.33%
Some CapEx rise while AMD is negative at -46.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
84.18%
Some acquisitions while AMD is negative at -56.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-165.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while AMD stands at 18.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-15.46%
We reduce yoy sales while AMD is 60.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
49700.00%
Growth well above AMD's 977.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
146.91%
Investing outflow well above AMD's 48.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
11.58%
Debt repayment growth of 11.58% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with AMD at -95.12%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
27.99%
Buyback growth of 27.99% while AMD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.